Breaking: Nets Try To Bury The Durham Report 'Vague' And 'Only Helps Trump
I don't think anyone expected the nets to do anything other than fight to cover up the Durham federal filing that reportedly shows Clinton hired a company to spy on Trump.
Since the filings prove that Trump was right, he was being spied on, the nets are doing damage control denouncing the report and 'vague' (CNN) and only 'useful to Trump' (Esquire).
It's interesting how quickly the nets rush to dismiss the finding when it's only the beginning.
The exact same vague language was used in the filing for the Meuller report. The nets think people are stupid with short memories. The very little reporting done on the Durham report dismissed it completely.
"Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to "infiltrate" servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an "inference" and "narrative" to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham says.
Durham filed a motion on Feb. 11 focused on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman, who has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent. Sussman has pleaded not guilty.
The indictment against Sussman says he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016, less than two months before the 2016 presidential election, that he was not doing work "for any client" when he requested and held a meeting in which he presented "purported data and 'white papers' that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel" between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.
But Durham's filing on Feb. 11, in a section titled "Factual Background," reveals that Sussman "had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign."
Durham’s filing said Sussman’s "billing records reflect" that he "repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations."
Some Democrats knew this already. They didn’t call it out. They let it go. https://t.co/cbT5YjMsoL
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) February 12, 2022
[…]
Durham states that the internet company that Tech Executive-1 worked for "had come to access and maintain dedicated servers" for the Executive Office of the President as "part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP."
"Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump," Durham states."
