Liberal Academics Finds A New Stupid Way To Call People Racist
Liberals claim they want to fix all of the issues that our society struggles with, but then spend countless hours trying to find ways to divide us. They come up with asinine reasons to label each other racist and then are surprised that people are upset with their backward reasoning. Some Liberal academics are now claiming that you might be racist if you don't like Pitbulls.
"The Animal Farm Foundation, a non-profit “dedicated to securing equal treatment and opportunity for ‘pit bull’ dogs and their owners”, has launched a new initiative to combat “exclusionary dog breed restrictions in the housing insurance industry.”
In its statement, the AFF cites the work of Ann Linder, a Legislative Policy Fellow with Harvard Law School’s Animal Law and Policy Program. According to her paper, “The Black Man’s Dog: The Social Context of Breed Specific Legislation”, pit bulls have been unfairly tied to “gang violence by urban youths, as well as the hip-hop music scene.”
Also referenced is the work of Emory University associate professor of philosophy, Erin Tarver. In her work "The Dangerous Individual(’s) Dog: Race, Criminality and the ‘Pit Bull’," Tarver applies French philosopher Michel Focault’s notion of “the dangerous individual” to what she sees as modern racialized attitudes towards pit bulls and the “perceived threat to normative whiteness” such animals pose.
Despite accounting for just 6.5% of all dogs in the United States, pit bulls were responsible for 66% of total fatal dog attacks between 2005 and 2017.
Tying the societal perception of pit bulls to anti-Black racism has become a theme in certain American academic circles."
So this is insane. Pitbulls are aggressive dogs that are not for everyone. They are frequently used in dogfights and have gained a bad reputation after the numerous times Pitbulls attacked humans. But Pitbulls are not black people, they are dogs. So this whole idea that if you are wary of Pitbulls, you are racist is just pure B.S.