Watch: Schiff's Lies Are Catching Up To Him, His Security Clearance In Question
Politics sometimes works from the outside in. With enough public outcry, politicians eventually have no choice but to act. Unless you're a Clinton than you are totally exempt from this rule- and we still don't know why.
Adam Schiff's pursuit to impeach Trump has revealed, to those who didn't know him well, just how much he lies. The only thing protecting Schiff at this point is his high ranking friends and a clause that says anything says you cannot prosecution while representing their respective Houses.
"Except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place"
We can argue that Schiff's lies are a direct attempt of treason but the point is that the clause is what imboldens politicians on the Senate floor. It's given Schiff the power to make wild and false accusations to smear the administration without fear of legal backlash.
It does not, however, protect him from losing House privileges like his security clearance. And people are starting to bring that up. People like former ( R) Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz asked Tuesday why Democratic California Rep. Adam Schiff should possess a security clearance when “he continues to lie.”
A point that a Jason Chaffetz pointed out during his interview on Fox News:
“I still, to this day, do not understand why Adam Schiff has a security clearance. He continues to lie. He continues to put out information that he knows is not true. He has stood in front of the United States Senate and talked about things that are not in the impeachment,” Chaffetz said. “I think he is a terrible embarrassment and somebody has got to, I hope, answer the question, ‘why do you have a security clearance?'”
A Fox host reminded Chaffetz of how, just the night before, Schiff had suggested that the president could sell Alaska back to Russia in exchange for aid in the 2020 election if abuse of power was not found to be an impeachable offense.
“Give away Alaska. How do Democrats with a straight face say we can’t have Donald Trump in the presidency because, well, we are worried about the integrity of the election. Time to maybe go look in the mirror here a little bit, folks.”
They weren't worried about the integrity of the election when they dragged the administration through the FISA warrant investigation. They haven't worried about the integrity of the election or the faith of the American people as they rejected Robert Mueller's findings in the Russia investigation.
And they are certainly not worried about the integrity of the election while pursuing impeachment of a sitting president based on hearsay and false claims. It's time to start calling BS what it is and remove the privileges of anyone who intentionally deceives the American public, like Shiff.
America does not need another lying Democrat in power with access to its most sensitive information and places is just a 'Hillary level' security risk. Revoking Adma Schiff's security clearance and opening an investigation into his entire career seems more than fair to me. What do you think? Let me know in the comments below.
You may be interested
Virginia Man Arrested For Defending Store From CriminalsRandy Stevens - April 2, 2020
A Virginia shop clerk, Hamzeh Abushariah, has been arrested and the D.A. is refusing to let him be bailed out.…
Soccer Manager Puts Reporter In His Place When Asked About Coronavirus ConcernsJessica Ripple - April 2, 2020
In this day and age everyone in an expert. Be it online or in front of a microphone, if you…
GOP Congressman Wants Answers After Chinese Reporters Vanish Without A TraceJessica Ripple - April 2, 2020
GOP Rep. from Indiana Jim Banks sent a letter to the U.S. State Department Wednesday, seeking to open an investigation…