Lead Patriot

Right Leaning Commentary

Sisson Comments On Rhetoric
The Scoop

Sisson Comments On Rhetoric

If there were a Mount Rushmore of unintentional self-owns, Harry Sisson just carved his spot. The Biden shill-turned-TikTok pundit wandered onto Piers Morgan Uncensored—a bold move for someone whose grasp on reality is only slightly firmer than his grip on history—and made the mistake of challenging the panel to name a single high-level Democrat who’s ever compared Donald Trump to Hitler.

Cue the avalanche.


It wasn’t even a slow burn. It was a full-scale rhetorical demolition. Within seconds, the panel rolled out example after example of elected Democrats and media surrogates drawing direct parallels between Trump and one of the most reviled figures in world history. Jake Tapper and Dana Bash—hardly fringe figures—have both compared Trump’s rhetoric to that of Hitler. Tapper even did a solemn voiceover about it during CNN’s “town hall” with Trump. And let’s not pretend mainstream media figures don’t carry the Democratic Party’s water. They’ve just blurred the line between activist and anchor.

But it gets worse for Harry.


If he wanted elected officials, he should’ve known better than to go fishing with a paper net. He got Rep. Jasmine Crockett comparing Trump to “Temu Hitler” (we’re still trying to figure out if that was supposed to be clever or just cringe). Then there’s Tim Walz, the vice presidential hopeful who thought comparing Trump supporters in Madison Square Garden to Nazis was a winning strategy. And of course, Jen Rubin, who went full panic mode after the 2020 election and posted, “Hitler is in power.” You’d think someone that hysterical would be left in the blogosphere’s dustbin, but no—she’s still treated as a “serious” commentator.

So when Hunter Biden, of all people, claimed Trump was “painting a bullseye” on Harry Sisson by sharing a satirical AI video of a poop jet flyover, it wasn’t just ironic—it was rich. Sisson didn’t need Trump to paint a target on him. He volunteered for it. And the moment he said “name one high-level Democrat,” he basically stood up on national television, doused himself in rhetorical gasoline, and handed the panel a match.


Now, was there a literal bullseye in the video? No. But the metaphorical one? Oh, it was flashing in neon. The guy got absolutely nailed.

The real problem here isn’t just that Sisson was wrong—it’s that the entire Democratic strategy is built on gaslighting like this. Say the thing, deny you said it, accuse your opponent of the exact crime you committed, then act wounded when someone rolls the tape. It’s politics by illusion, but in the age of receipts, it falls apart faster than a Joy Reid monologue.

Written by Arthur Higgens - October 22, 2025