Sorbo Comments On Ad Idea
With Super Bowl Sunday approaching, the focus is once again on record-breaking ad buys, cultural spectacle, and the unmatched size of the audience tuning in. That massive viewership is precisely why some political observers argue the game represents a missed opportunity for a very different kind of messaging—one that highlights political inconsistency rather than selling soda, trucks, or movie trailers.
Can somebody air this on the Superbowl Please?pic.twitter.com/YZMyjcoNWv
— Kevin Sorbo (@ksorbs) February 4, 2026
The idea circulating online is simple: a tightly edited video montage showing prominent Democrats contradicting themselves on major issues, presented back-to-back in a way that requires no narration or commentary. The appeal of such a spot lies in its efficiency. Instead of argument, it relies on direct quotes and archived footage, allowing viewers to draw their own conclusions. Supporters argue that this kind of visual contrast is far more persuasive than traditional political ads, particularly with voters who are fatigued by partisan rhetoric.
Agree.
I made this as a free ad for Super Bowl week and beyond, @RNCResearch @GOP @TeamTrump
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) February 4, 2026
The proposed ad reportedly originated with the social media account @WesternLensman and has already gained traction as a “ready-made” political message. Actor Kevin Sorbo is among those who publicly suggested it would have been perfectly timed for a Super Bowl audience, even joking about its placement just before the halftime show. While Super Bowl ad inventory was reportedly sold out months ago, the enthusiasm surrounding the clip has fueled speculation that a sufficiently motivated donor base could have crowd-sourced the funds if the opportunity had existed.
Dang, @WesternLensman , that is OUTSTANDING!
Bravo!
That should not only be played during the Superbowl, but also every day on every channel until midterms.— Aidan_MacAnBhaird (@EverHerself) February 4, 2026
What makes the concept noteworthy is not just its humor or timing, but its broader strategic implications. Political advertising increasingly favors repetition and simplicity, and advocates believe this particular video checks both boxes.
The suggestion that it should be placed into regular rotation for Republican National Committee ad buys through the next election cycle reflects a belief that voters respond more strongly to perceived hypocrisy than to policy white papers or campaign promises.
Whether or not such an ad ever appears during an event as massive as the Super Bowl, the enthusiasm around it underscores a broader reality of modern campaigning. Politics increasingly borrows from entertainment, and moments of cultural convergence offer rare chances to reach beyond the usual partisan audience.
